Both headsets can also be used indefinitely while plugged into a wall. Meta’s headset has the battery built into the headset itself, while Apple opted for a battery pack that connects via a cord and can sit in your pocket or nearby. In terms of battery life, however, they’re in the same ballpark: Apple promises up to two hours of use with the Vision Pro, while Meta provides a 1-2 hour estimate for the Quest Pro. The Quest Pro pushes out solidly impressive 3D experiences, but the Vision Pro is likely capable of much more immersive apps and games. Meanwhile, the Quest Pro uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon XR2+ chip-a processor built for headsets but ultimately based on its widely-used smartphone tech. The Vision Pro packs the same M2 processor used in Apple’s latest class-leading laptops and a separate chip designed specifically to interpret camera and sensor data. Power and batteryĪs with our previous match-up between the Apple Vision Pro and the Meta Quest Pro, this compares a powerful computer and a powerful smartphone. In other words, it’s a significant difference-a denser screen typically means crisper text and sharper graphics-and the Quest Pro has no external display to share a look at the wearer from inside the headset. Meanwhile, the Meta Quest Pro delivers a resolution of 1,920 x 1,800 per eye, which yields about 7 million total pixels. That’s intended to enable more natural interactions with people around you, so you don’t feel like you need to pull off the headset to hold a conversation. We don’t have exact dimensions or weight yet for the Vision Pro, but the Quest Pro weighs in at 722g-about 44% heavier than the base level Quest 2 model.Īnd there’s another display-one on the outside of the headset that shows a view of the wearer’s eyes via an internal camera. Meanwhile, the Meta Quest Pro is a bit larger, boxier, and dominated by black plastic. The Apple Vision Pro is heavy on sleek metal and glass, all curvy and slim.Īpple Reveals $3,499 Vision Pro Augmented Reality Headset The difference here is much the same as you’d find in comparing a high-end “flagship” smartphone with a budget model. That’s more than three times the price of the entry-level Quest 2, but still a fraction of Apple’s ask. The Meta Quest Pro appeared pricey compared to previous Quest headsets when it debuted at $1,500 last fall-but following a muted response and mixed reviews, Meta dropped the price point to $1,000. ![]() ![]() For example, that’s dramatically more expensive than a MacBook featuring the same processor and far more costly than the current crop of consumer-focused AR and VR headsets. ![]() Meta Quest 3: What's the Difference? Price and availabilityĪpple’s Vision Pro will roll out early next year in the United States at a startling price of $3,499. Here’s a look at how the Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest Pro compare-and if you missed it, be sure to read our head-to-head look at the Vision Pro and upcoming Meta Quest 3. The two Pro devices share some common features and capabilities, but they’re also far apart in some ways, especially regarding price, power, and high-end features. It’s a high-end, cutting-edge device with a lavish price point to match.Īnd when it lands in early 2024, it’ll face competition from another “Pro” headset that’s already on the market from a rival tech giant: Meta’s Quest Pro, a more advanced riff on its popular (and much more affordable) Quest 2 device. The headset wars are heating up: Apple finally revealed its Vision Pro device this week, with the mixed reality headset providing both augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) capabilities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |